At the time of writing (09.06.2026), the tech press has been covering the release of a new open-source project (backed by Microsoft) called “Euro-Office.” (Euro-Office on Github)

The project effectively introduces an open-source competitor with the possibility of full sovereignty, potentially making it part of the future technology pipeline of many companies.

As the push for privacy and sovereignty sweeps across Europe, this may signal very good times for the IT sector. While investing directly in infrastructure may not be within everyone’s means, it could certainly open the door to a more diverse market in which software development regains some of its value.

While we may still experience fads along the lines of vibe coding, the appeal of tokenized production to rapidly bring minimum viable products (MVPs) to market will likely diminish when significant upfront infrastructure investments become necessary.

Incidentally, this presents a strong opportunity to return to more robust idea-driven markets, where coding as a skill may once again increase in value for the broader population.

Why?

Well, the more we free ourselves from the dominant actors in the market, the more potential customers will require local solutions.
While it would be naive to expect the entire bloc to isolate itself from Microsoft, smart procurement strategies, hybrid operating models, and the adoption of more open-source operating systems, such as Ubuntu, could shift entire sectors of the IT economy into suddenly more profitable markets.

Arguably, regulation—which has been a constant target of criticism toward the EU in matters of IT implementation—might ultimately provide it with a stronger position.

Not today, perhaps, but not that far into the future either. Within a decade, it is fairly easy to imagine a growing and increasingly healthy service sector providing all sorts of products and services across the continent. This would not be entirely unprecedented. Europe has a long history of exporting expertise, services, and technical knowledge to other parts of the world.

True, in a more interconnected world, this can also work in the opposite direction. However, one of the main problems Europe is facing—and one that indirectly affects its creative potential—is not a lack of ideas, but an aging population.

Culturally speaking, it has also been observed that the continent generally favors stability. One might argue that this is part and parcel of the same phenomenon, as startups tend not only to be underpaid but also to offer less security. As a result, entrepreneurs would likely benefit from starting earlier in life.

In fairness, the successful entrepreneur tends to emerge around the age of 50, when many of life’s major milestones have already been achieved—at least if we are to consider Good to Great by Jim Collins a source of authority. From my own observations, having lived in different countries, he is not far off. This would place entrepreneurial risk aversion more in the realm of personality traits than purely economic circumstances.

Time will tell. After all, economic crises tend to be fertile ground for innovation, as there is no second place in war. Harsher resource environments incentivize participants in any economy to find new ways to solve problems and reduce costs.

Arguably, that has always been one of the great strengths of the open-source movement: when resources become scarce, “it’s free” is a remarkably compelling argument.

---

The Pocket AI Guide is out!

📙 Amazon US: https://a.co/d/gCHHDax
📗 In Europe Amazon Germany: https://amzn.eu/d/3cmlIqa
(Available in other stores Amazon stores too in Europe)

Check the free resources in this website!